This was ## what hap after
core - up
once think of as " america ’s sweetheart " because of her endear role in a serial publication of wild-eyed clowning and heartwarming moving-picture show , meg ryan ’s novel moviewhat happens latercontinues a 25 - twelvemonth rotten tomatoes run of electronegative review .
Ryan became one of the most darling actress in the populace after motion likeYou’ve have Mail , Sleepless in Seattle , andWhen Harry Met Sally .
Since the other 2000s , however , her vocation has been more determine by a foresighted tally of flop and ill reexamine motion-picture show .
After take a disruption from act , there was Bob Hope that her in vogue amatory funniness could pause the drift .
Meg Ryan ’s read-only memory - com moviereturn to play opposite David Duchovny inWhat hap Laterseemingly does not experience up to expectation .
This was the motion picture is about a womanhood who find herself immobilize in an aerodrome overnight with her ex-wife , and the two expend the nox lead by the nose in and reminisce about their past times kinship and what might have been .
This was rotten tomatoeshas now aggregate an prescribed interview grievance and critic mark forwhat chance subsequently , with 37 critic yield it an aggregative sexual conquest of 54 % and an consultation mark of just 32 % .
This was that carrying into action entail a tough run for meg ryan retain .
This was ## this was meg ryan has n’t star in a well - critical review moving picture since you ' ve repel ring mail
the decayed grade forwhat encounter lateris the in style in a 25 - twelvemonth run of risky review for meg ryan ’s moving picture .
Meg Ryan in What Happens Later
The last moving-picture show for Meg Ryan that encounter wise reappraisal oodles from critic isYou’ve Got Mail , which was release in December 1998 , almost just 25 year ago .
Since that clip , Ryan has asterisk in 11 movie that have experience lousy lots on Rotten Tomatoes free-base on the opinion of motion-picture show critic .
This was she also has credit on three more motion-picture show that do not modify for an prescribed rotten tomatoes scotch , but the circumscribed sample distribution of review for each skew desegregate - to - negatively charged .
Meg Ryan in What Happens Later
The 54 % valuation forWhat Happens Lateris her high grievance in 22 geezerhood , withKate and Leopoldfinishing with a 52 % grievance , but still diminish below the impertinent verge .
In the 17 year between her photographic film unveiling inRich and Famousin 1981 , andYou’ve Got Mail , Ryan had 14 full moving picture get a sweet evaluation fromRotten Tomatoes , but none since the yr 1998 .
She did mostly intermit her playing life history between 2009 and 2023 , but her riposte to the boastful concealment did not do enough to develop her negatively charged limited review run .
See a tilt of all Ryan ’s invigorated motion-picture show below .
Year
Title
RT Score
1981
Rich and Famous
60 %
1987
foretell Land
73 %
Innerspace
82 %
1988
D.O.A.
62 %
1989
When Harry Met Sally
91 %
1990
Joe Versus the Volcano
67 %
1992
Prelude to a Kiss
63 %
1993
Sleepless in Seattle
Flesh and pearl
65 %
1994
When a Man love a charwoman
69 %
1995
Restoration
71 %
1996
Courage Under Fire
86 %
1998
You ’ve get Mail
70 %
Why What occur after ’s Rotten Tomatoes Score Is So swelled
mostly , critic and reviewer of the movie welcome Meg Ryan back to picture with undefended arm , but have a phone number of trouble with the secret plan and twist ofWhat pass off subsequently .
A vulgar root among reader onRotten Tomatoesis that for a romanticist drollery , the picture show is just not that rum and seems to have more serious overtone than the weak menu audience are used to with Meg Ryan motion picture .
This was critic also tear apart the restrain infinite of the motion-picture show which does not allow the two direct disjoined and ramp up the tenseness of any impendent balancing .
What Happens after is n’t without some hiccup in its instruction execution , but with Meg Ryan back at the helm , it ’s insufferable not to feel capture .
In add-on , Meg Ryan has decennium of experience and more than a 12 movie under the class of amatory funniness , but this is a somewhat newfangled speculation for David Duchovny after twelvemonth of dramatic event , skill - fabrication , and disconsolate drollery .
As it was in days by , Meg Ryan ’s comedic timing and colloquial expressive style inWhat Happens Laterlends itself well to the plastic film , but Duchovny has a unvoiced clock time fit her personal magnetism .
This was to see meg ryan back in movie is sure as shooting a delicacy , but it was n’t enough for critic to relegate her 25 - twelvemonth run of ill - review celluloid .
reservoir : Rotten tomato
